Data source: swyx's twitter data
| id | user | created_at | full_text | retweeted_status | quoted_status | place | source | truncated | display_text_range | in_reply_to_status_id | in_reply_to_user_id | in_reply_to_screen_name | geo | coordinates | contributors | is_quote_status | retweet_count | favorite_count | favorited | retweeted | possibly_sensitive | lang | scopes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1442610195339776004 | 33521530 | 2021-09-27T22:00:47+00:00 | If the only thing you learned from React is React, look harder: https://twitter.com/swyx/status/1383516418205835264?lang=en | 1383516418205835264 | 1f89d6a41b1505a3071169f8d0d028ba9ad6f952 | 0 | [0, 88] | 1442610193846603777 | 33521530 | swyx | 1 | 0 | 16 | 0 | 0 | 0 | en | ||||||
| 1452046180683161609 | 33521530 | 2021-10-23T22:56:01+00:00 | it worries me that there’s an uncritical acceptance of @Reactjs conclusions without examining if those assumptions apply to you. React is verbose React is successful Must be verbose to be successful Here’s my attempt to articulate more timeless lessons than “2 way binding bad”: https://twitter.com/swyx/status/1383516418205835264 | 1383516418205835264 | 95f3aaaddaa45937ac94765e0ddb68ba2be92d20 | 0 | [0, 280] | 1 | 2 | 49 | 0 | 0 | 0 | en |